Mike Brown vs Shane O'Brien

Apr 02, 2009 3pd 03:39

2008-2009 Regular Season

Date / Time	Away / Home Team	Away / Home Player
Apr 02, 2009	Anaheim Ducks	Mike Brown
3pd 03:39	Vancouver Canucks	Shane O'Brien
Comments:

Your vote

You must login to vote.

You can sign up for free if you do not have an account already.

Results

Shane O'Brien		92.1%
Draw		6.9%
Mike Brown		1.0%
From 101 votes with an average rating of 5.1

More fights from this game

1pd 03:08	George Parros	vs	Darcy Hordichuk	Details
1pd 14:19	Sheldon Brookbank	vs	Rick Rypien	Details

User Reviews

Posted by b.t.wilson on Apr 03, 2009 at 8:34 AM agree

Brown is not a good fighter, its nice to see him take a few bops. O'Brien with an easy win here, not a great fight but not horrible. Called it a 5, which is absolutely the way I feel about it - okay fight.

Posted by rugby on Apr 03, 2009 at 9:50 AM agree

If they were to ban fighting at least we wouldn't have to watch Mike Brown anymore.

At least he didn't go straight for the takedown, speaking of which, since when did people give W's based on "but he got the takedown"? I have noticed that more and more on this site. What the f#@#k does that have to do with a hockey fight? More often than not it means you're bailing out.

Posted by lovejoy on Apr 03, 2009 at 2:27 AM agree

both guys scared of beeing hit kept in distance. Edge O'Brien for nice switch and couple of lefts in the end.

Posted by ETR on Apr 03, 2009 at 10:29 AM agree

Gave O'brein the edge, clean sweep for Vancouver in the fighting dept. last night

Posted by goody72 on Apr 03, 2009 at 3:22 PM agree

size advantage for O'Brien. he gets the win.

Posted by OriginalSix on Apr 04, 2009 at 1:00 AM agree

Dominating WIN for Shane O'Brien. Too much reach.

Posted by Dave Brown HOF on Apr 03, 2009 at 2:59 PM agree

Decision to OB.
Hey Claire Alexande, I noticed that you mentioned the size difference in this fight but not the size difference in the other 2 Canucks fights (Hordi 4 inches and probably 20 pounds and Rypien 3 inches and 40 pounds). How come? And you talk about OB being a spot picker, Wow!

Posted by pilney2110 on Apr 03, 2009 at 11:05 AM agree

brown immediately regrets that decision. obrien better dominate him.

Posted by infestedcut on Apr 04, 2009 at 8:44 AM agree

Mike Brown was fighting with the wrong person.

Posted by tidangles91 on Apr 03, 2009 at 4:22 PM agree

u ****in canucks fans. u were chirping ben eager for ****kicking bieksa after obrien darted towards the 6 ft guy adam burish. wtf is this? here we are again... a guy with a 3 inch advantage over brown. way to go obrien u scrub. im all blackhawks but nucks went 3/3 on the night for once.

Posted by JoeSchmo on Apr 03, 2009 at 2:10 PM agree

O'Brien lands two or three in an otherwise mediocre fight.

Posted by whereRURteeth on Apr 04, 2009 at 4:07 PM agree

Can be tough sometimes to judge a fight when all they do is grapple and hang on....but I'd have to give this one to O'Brien here.....he was more on the offensive rather thant he defensive such as the case was with Brown

Posted by Hmwrecker11 on Apr 03, 2009 at 1:28 PM agree

I agree with RUGBY here on the fight. who are the idiots that voted Mike Brown winner? Take-down does NOT define the fights' winner. O'Brien win easily. Canucks go 3-3 on the night

Posted by erik5sson on Apr 03, 2009 at 8:45 AM agree

OB was a giant compared to Brown, good for brown for steping up...but OB was just playing with him.

Posted by bashley on Apr 03, 2009 at 5:19 PM agree

shane ,as the big uncle D from the Brook says less gabben more jabben.