Possible Fights 1/19/12

[SyrCrunch11]

Originally Posted by Big Violence

When did Malkin try to low bridge Vinny? Take the glasses off the next time you watch a Pens game.

im referring to the incident which resulted in vinny popping him one, he "ducked under" vinny at the knees and tried it with boyle to

[IhateLindros]

Originally Posted by tim13

3. The Flyers always beat the Islanders so what the f*ck does that have to do with anything?

Oops...did you credibility take another shot here?

[bustoff]

Originally Posted by Nickanto

Hordi just challenged Reaves two face offs in a row. Sure wish Reaves would go more often....

Unless Hitch had him on a leash, that was bs on Reaves part. I hope since he signed his new contract, it didn't go to his head.......

[hockey doc]

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

Oops...did you credibility take another shot here?

No, but yours did. Isles are 1-23 in the last 24 against the Flyers.

[tim13]

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

Oops...did you credibility take another shot here?

My credibility? I catch you with your hand in the cookie jar telling a blatant lie and it's my credibility taking a shot. The logic you've displayed throughout this thread is spellbinding.

[gdameo]

Originally Posted by tim13

My credibility? I catch you with your hand in the cookie jar telling a blatant lie and it's my credibility taking a shot. The logic you've displayed throughout this thread is spellbinding.

yep and his statement (1-23 for Isles) is a lie too

[IhateLindros]

Originally Posted by hockey doc

No, but yours did. Isles are 1-23 in the last 24 against the Flyers.

First off who cares, second, what's your point? Nowhere did I make a post about how great the Isles were against the Flyers. Third of all this has nothing to do with Flyer fans, just Tim. I'm calling him out for talking out of his ass and not knowing what he was talking about.

Originally Posted by tim13

My credibility? I catch you with your hand in the cookie jar telling a blatant lie and it's my credibility taking a shot. The logic you've displayed throughout this thread is spellbinding.

Again, not my fault you don't know all the facts. You were the one blatantly lying about how the Flyers ALWAYS beat the Islanders (which was a flat out lie) and that Simmonds has 3 KO's this year among other BS statements you threw out there.

Originally Posted by gdameo

yep and his statement (1-23 for Isles) is a lie too

Yeah try again, that was somebody else. i honestly have no clue what their record is against them. Nor do I really care. The point was this clown started **** with me and then decided to throw out nonsense. So I called him out on it.


Quotes from Newsday...

None of the Flyers responded much to the line of questioning from reporters, and there was no chance to hold Staios to NHL justice.

Staios and the rest of the Islanders were in the dark as to why the Flyers would want to exact revenge on him for the hit, which did not draw the interest of NHL's Brendan Shanahan.

[pesadillamal]

Originally Posted by tim13

I like Haley a lot too and Rinaldo certainly turned him down but the Bickel one is bullsh*t. All 24/7 "clearly" showed was that Rinaldo was trying to get back in the play and Bickel interfered with him. Rinaldo asking the ref "are you f*cking kidding me?" is the nail in the coffin to the turn down theory.

And excuse Rinaldo for calling out a guy for refusing to drop the gloves with him after HE (Dubi) went to the media calling Rinaldo an idiot and knocking him as a player.

Originally Posted by tim13

I don't want to flood this thread with a stupid argument that has already been had in another thread where the Rangers fans conceded that Rinaldo didn't perceive that to be a challenge. I've already said everything I had to say on the matter in that thread. The bottom line is there is no possible context in which Rinaldo would respond to a challenge by saying that. It just doesn't make any sense.

I take a look back at this thread to see how this started and I see this garbage. You really are a habitual liar. That was definitely a challenge by Bickel and the only thing I said was that Rinaldo could have been saying that to the ref because he was looking for an interference penalty. He was looking for an interference penalty because Bickel held him up to challenge him and he didn't want to fight. Clear as day. Sucking off Devils fans is all you are good at because your lies are pathetic and when you get caught in them you are "just kidding". What an annoying little pissant you have become.

[thekidd21]

Rinaldo declined Bickel that game and Rupp denied Shelley.

Who cares!

[pesadillamal]

Originally Posted by thekidd21

Rinaldo declined Bickel that game and Rupp denied Shelley.

Who cares!

Believe me kidd, that was my point. I only brought up Rinaldo decling the fight because a couple nFlyer fans were acting like only Rangers decline fights. A player like Rinaldo can't accept every fight or he would be worthless, and that is what I said in the 24/7 thread. My point was it happens, who cares? I would love to have that kid on my team.

This isn't to you kidd 21, I just don't want to postwhore so I have to expose the lies in this post. Not trying to draw you into anything.

You could see what timmy typed about Ranger fans (I think I was the only one) "conceding that Rinaldo didn't perceive that to be a challenge". Well, here was my last post on the matter;

I was glad you mentioned that Rinaldo was talking to the ref because I think that is exactly what he was doing now. There was no reason to say that to Bickel. But that interference was a challenge I promise. I was also pleasently surprised there was no penalty on the play because the ref saw it all, from Rinaldo giving Erixon the business to the interference/challenge.

24/7 - Flyers/Rangers

You love to throw lists out as posts timmy well here is a short list for you.

1. You are a liar.

[tim13]

Originally Posted by pesadillamal

Believe me kidd, that was my point. I only brought up Rinaldo decling the fight because a couple nFlyer fans were acting like only Rangers decline fights. A player like Rinaldo can't accept every fight or he would be worthless, and that is what I said in the 24/7 thread. My point was it happens, who cares? I would love to have that kid on my team.

This isn't to you kidd 21, I just don't want to postwhore so I have to expose the lies in this post. Not trying to draw you into anything.

You could see what timmy typed about Ranger fans (I think I was the only one) "conceding that Rinaldo didn't perceive that to be a challenge". Well, here was my last post on the matter;



24/7 - Flyers/Rangers

You love to throw lists out as posts timmy well here is a short list for you.

1. You are a liar.

Ha so that's how it is, huh Pesa?

Glad I luckily came across this. Thanks for admitting in your post that I wasn't lying about your conceding that Rinaldo didn't perceive that as a challenge and then backing it up with a quote, thus negating the entire "point" of your rant. Hell, you even said you were glad I brought up my angle because it caused you to see it differently. And then neither you nor any other Rangers fan disagreed with my interpretation. You, in fact, as you quoted above, affirmed it.

And what you're referring to from the Brodeur thread was a f*cking joke and you know it. I've also never even come close to personally attacking you. Quite the contrary. I was running with a basketball analogy that you started and referenced Gump Worsley for f*ck's sake. My apologies for not being able to stay 100% serious in a 20 page thread where people like you are promoting the ridiculous notion that Lundqvist is comparable to Brodeur. And before you tell me you weren't doing that, I know you were tempering it, but you were still offering support to the stupid side of the argument.


Now for the other fool...

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

You were the one blatantly lying about how the Flyers ALWAYS beat the Islanders (which was a flat out lie) and that Simmonds has 3 KO's this year among other BS statements you threw out there..

Ha, the Flyers had beaten the Isles 23 of 24 times going into Thursday night. Excuse me for getting that excused with always.

http://www.islanderspointblank.com/2...lly-continues/

Simmonds has 1 KO and 2 TKOs; how about that? You're right though, I'm sure Steve Staios would f*ck his ass up.

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

i honestly have no clue what their record is against them....

Now you know. 1-23 going into Thursday. Certainly sufficient for me to use the term "always" in the context I used it.

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

The point was this clown started **** with me and then decided to throw out nonsense. So I called him out on it.

You stated that Staios had been scratched the last two games going into the Flyers game. That was a lie. You doubled the number for effect. It's cool, you could've just back tracked and said "oh, my mistake,I thought he was scratched the last two." Hell, I didn't even know he was scratched the last one so I would've had no problem whatsoever with an honest mistake. I only kept at it because you denied your obvious intention. And you didn't call me on anything. Quite the contrary actually. It's all there in this thread.

Originally Posted by IhateLindros

Quotes from Newsday...

Wow, the 11-12 Islanders don't want to fight; what else is new? I think the Isles are a cool franchise but this year's version is lame. I'm sure we can agree on that.

[Flyers2001]

All of you guys take the term "pissing match" to a new level.

[pesadillamal]

Originally Posted by tim13

Ha so that's how it is, huh Pesa?

Glad I luckily came across this. Thanks for admitting in your post that I wasn't lying about your conceding that Rinaldo didn't perceive that as a challenge and then backing it up with a quote, thus negating the entire "point" of your rant. Hell, you even said you were glad I brought up my angle because it caused you to see it differently. And then neither you nor any other Rangers fan disagreed with my interpretation. You, in fact, as you quoted above, affirmed it.

I apologize for the personal attack but I couldn't believe what I saw. And really, I still don't. Just because Rinaldo wanted a penalty for interference doesn't mean he didn't perceive that as a challenge. I never agreed to that and never will because Bickel started going at him behind the net and even asked "You wanna go?". The only thing I give you is that Rinaldo could have been talking to the ref instead of Bickel. It was a challenge and me, Rinaldo, and most others know that. I never said Rinaldo didn't perceive that to be a challenge so that is in fact a lie, or at the very least putting words in my mouth.

Originally Posted by tim13

And what you're referring to from the Brodeur thread was a f*cking joke and you know it. I've also never even come close to personally attacking you. Quite the contrary. I was running with a basketball analogy that you started and referenced Gump Worsley for f*ck's sake. My apologies for not being able to stay 100% serious in a 20 page thread where people like you are promoting the ridiculous notion that Lundqvist is comparable to Brodeur. And before you tell me you weren't doing that, I know you were tempering it, but you were still offering support to the stupid side of the argument.
.

No, I don't know that was a joke. Gump Worsley has nothing to do with a basketball analogy and the only part of your list I remember having anything to do with basketball was number 5. As a matter in fact, you accused me of saying Henry was comparable to Marty for his career and you do that again here, so how was that a joke? Looks more like a lie to me.

It was odd to me that I couldn't point out some of the bad stats of fatso Marty in a thread where Henry was getting bashed without you jumping in to be a hero, and even stating later that your posts "where well received". Shocking that Devil fans loved your posts. Sure bigjack went over the top but he was taking a ton of heat and I have no problem taking some of that for him.

[IhateLindros]

Originally Posted by tim13

Ha, the Flyers had beaten the Isles 23 of 24 times going into Thursday night. Excuse me for getting that excused with always.

Oh, Im sorry...are you referring to CONTEXT? Funny how now you can backtrack on CONTEXT when you repeatedly didn't understand the CONTEXT of what I was saying. Quite laughable that it's okay for you to bring that up when you were a victim of the same thing.

Oh yeah and and that last statement.....wtf does that even mean? Maybe while you're working on your math, you can work on your English as well.

Originally Posted by tim13

Simmonds has 1 KO and 2 TKOs; how about that? You're right though, I'm sure Steve Staios would f*ck his ass up.

Where the hell did you grab that stat from? Must have been from your ass since Simmonds has 5 fights this year. 3 of them were KO's?? Yeah right okay. You def are an idiot.

Originally Posted by tim13

Now you know. 1-23 going into Thursday. Certainly sufficient for me to use the term "always" in the context I used it.

No, actually its not. Again, you are backtracking on the fact that you got called out on a lie. Keep trying though, maybe you'll convince yourself you're not a complete idiot. Funny that other people have come forward calling you out for being full of **** too. Oh yeah and I never said Staois would beat Simmonds, or fight him for that matter. I just said he wasn't afraid of him. But make sure you try real hard to turn that one around too just to make yourself feel better.

Originally Posted by tim13

You stated that Staios had been scratched the last two games going into the Flyers game. That was a lie. You doubled the number for effect. It's cool, you could've just back tracked and said "oh, my mistake,I thought he was scratched the last two." Hell, I didn't even know he was scratched the last one so I would've had no problem whatsoever with an honest mistake. I only kept at it because you denied your obvious intention. And you didn't call me on anything. Quite the contrary actually. It's all there in this thread.

I said Staois had been scratched for 2 games and after you ran your mouth I explained to you what I meant. He was announced scratched more than 9 hours before gametime. That's 2 games. Not my fault you didn't understand. I explained to you what I meant and you continued to be a hypocrite and call me a liar when you sir, were called out by more than one person for being a liar. And to add to that, YOU read the thread. Count how many times you made **** up, and made yourself look like an ass. Yup, you got called out and are now trying to backtrack with your "you didn't understand my context" BS.

F*** your lack of context, you are a liar and now a hypocrite. And as you just said "Its all in the thread."