Originally Posted by tim13
Why not just offer your description of the fight (which you haven't done) rather than come in here insulting a whole sh*t load of posters? Don't you think that might be more beneficial to the thread?
For example, you could explain what Thornton did to earn such a decisive victory in this fight. After all, you are in the minority here, as most people are calling this a draw or an edge whereas you apparently saw a landslide. You're the one calling people out for seeing it differently than you; I'm fine with a draw or edge either way.
First off, where do you see me saying that Thornton "earn(ed) such a decisive victory?" Please, point it out. I was surprised to see Thornton going southpaw for most of the fight, made me wonder if his right hand was damaged. As for the results...a draw. Anyone who says that Shelly one is a Philly homer...but that's what's got your panties in a bunch...I don't see anything wrong with homers. This is a forum concerning HOCKEY FIGHTS. I belong to other forums that focus on math. literature and politics. I expect them to present fact based arguments. Here I expect to find FANS. You know, people who root for a specific team. As far as I'm concerned they should be proud of their homerism...they're good fans. Yes, I loved Derek Sanderson
as the B's color guy...he was the greatest homer ever to grace the airwaves. As for the other fights...Kelly's didn't amount to much and Lucic just handed Sestito a plain old fashion beat down. Questions?