|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Laraque was more disappointing. He hardly fights anymore. At least George Parros fights a lot and his overall game has improved a lot.
__________________
#21 McKay formerly MVgiants17 |
| The Following User Says Thank You to NJDevils17 For This Useful Post: | ||
Gtrain15 (06-22-2009) | ||
|
||||
|
Laraque. He's lost his passion for the game and for fighting and it shows.
__________________
"I don't care how fast a skater you are, if you don't play this game with a big heart and a big bag of knuckles in front of the net, you don't got dinky-do." -Donnie Shulzhoffer, Mystery, Alaska http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnoaj8b2bGM |
|
||||
|
WRONG!
Isn't it annoying when someone tells you your opinion is wrong? I have Laraque at 7-0-2. You can say whatever you want about 'control', but in the Fritz fight I saw only a punch land from each, and due to his reach, many people simply assumed his punches landed. To me, it was a crap fight where barely anything landed. Fritz did a great job holding off the champ, but I don't see how you could call even a season with one loss at the most a diappointment, at least moreso than George Parros. |
|
||||
|
BGL.
It's not what he DID that was dissappointing (had some good tilts, albeit not nearly enough imo) ... it's what he DIDN'T do (issuing invitations instead of handling his business) !
__________________
____________________________________________ The above post was my opinion ONLY. Don't get your panties in a knot. Warning : sometimes I argue just for the sake of argument.WWBD BFM-2010 FREE the FROG
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|