More disappointing this year: Laraque or Parros?

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by pbag

The fact that you have decided to change the meaning of your first post is hilarious and somewhat tragic. Because thats exactly what you did right?

Uhh, it was your post i was after.. Which eventually lead me to pose a question.

Apparently you have no clue what happens when you type certain things. Again, this leads up to that legendary post of yours.. See, i believe post #2 from me clears somethings up. Pay attention b1tch.

Hahahaha I see you are still an idiot.

Nowhere did I change the meaning of my first post. If I did, please show me?

See the post you were after, that I understand. But you still quoted only my post, and did not actually ask me any question. Can you go back up abit and see what you quoted , then what you said? English hard for you to understand??


You wanted me to clarify what I meant when i stated how Id like some of you to go up to Georges and tell him your opinions. You had your own conclusions before I typed another word---You know like hes my god, a victim, you cannot crticize him or anyone etc.. etc.. etc..

Why did you need me to interpret what i said?? It seems to me now that I ask, you claim it was just sarcasm. Beautiful, so this is your way out. Thank you for wasting my time. Your spineless buddy, you accuse me of this and that, then plead some silly nonsense like sarcasm You my friend are a joke.


BTW--thanks for saying my post was legendary

BTW2--Ok Im done here with you. Ive wasted way too much time. Enjoy.

[pbag]

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

Hahahaha I see you are still an idiot.

Nowhere did I change the meaning of my first post. If I did, please show me?

You did not? Then say so. This is wher i have a problem with you. You get in trouble but has to await a few replies to decide which answer is the most convenient. It took you like 20 posts to clarify what you meant in your first post... which i have a hard time to believe.

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

See the post you were after, that I understand. But you still quoted only my post, and did not actually ask me any question. Can you go back up abit and see what you quoted , then what you said? English hard for you to understand??

Whitout the post, no question. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand, wheter i quoted your or my post. You kept on ducking my question. Actually it was two when i think about it.

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

You wanted me to clarify what I meant when i stated how Id like some of you to go up to Georges and tell him your opinions. You had your own conclusions before I typed another word---You know like hes my god, a victim, you cannot crticize him or anyone etc.. etc.. etc..

Why did you need me to interpret what i said?? It seems to me now that I ask, you claim it was just sarcasm. Beautiful, so this is your way out. Thank you for wasting my time. Your spineless buddy, you accuse me of this and that, then plead some silly nonsense like sarcasm You my friend are a joke.

Actually, i claimed sarcasm in my second post, i even pointed out which part i was talking about. Nice try but failure. It's all there and has been since i posted it, don't even try.
You lacking reading comprehension is not my fault.

The part about critizism was not sarcasm, just to clear things up. That was a legit question. And yes i came to a conclution by what you said in that post of yours.. After that you had trouble keeping your composure and went on about Georges fighting skills. Now you are just backpeddling.


Btw, i don't think Georges would give a sh1t if a fat greasy slob like you would share your inner thoughts face to face. Unless they are positive. And right there is where you victimized him. He wouldn't mind, i'm sure.

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by pbag

You did not? Then say so. This is wher i have a problem with you. You get in trouble but has to await a few replies to decide which answer is the most convenient. It took you like 20 posts to clarify what you meant in your first post... which i have a hard time to believe.


Whitout the post, no question. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand, wheter i quoted your or my post. You kept on ducking my question. Actually it was two when i think about it.





Actually, i claimed sarcasm in my second post, i even pointed out which part i was talking about. Nice try but failure. It's all there and has been since i posted it, don't even try.
You lacking reading comprehension is not my fault.

The part about critizism was not sarcasm, just to clear things up. That was a legit question. And yes i came to a conclution by what you said in that post of yours.. After that you had trouble keeping your composure and went on about Georges fighting skills. Now you are just backpeddling.


Btw, i don't think Georges would give a sh1t if a fat greasy slob like you would share your inner thoughts face to face. Unless they are positive. And right there is where you victimized him. He wouldn't mind, i'm sure.

Sorry, I guess i just cannot leave well enough alone.

Please tell me how I got in trouble? What from you interpreting what i wrote as something which it was not? You my friend have a reading problem. You assumed what I wrote was one thing while it was another. Hence why I should never have had to explain myself to you. You can imagine what you like on this issue, as long as it suits what you think, then you'll feel vindicated.

So here's what I said--- "I'd love to see some of you people go up to him and tell him what you think". And you my friend interpreted it as ---"You mean every opinion shared on this board should be presented to the object it was aimed to by the bystander who coined it? That would be alot of awkward confrontations, especially for the poor victim, the defenceless athlete".

I never said that did I? ( or did you assume this is what i meant?)

"So, when did giving Georges Laraque negative critique turn taboo?"

I never said it was. (but you assumed this is what I meant?) Your expectation was for me to answer this, yes? But why should I have since I never claimed this in the first place. You just decided that this is what i was thinking. Great like 1984. You control my thoughts.

"You clearly stated that people that have the nerve to critizise your god, shouldn't unless they'd would walk straight up to him and tell it face to face".

Did i state this? Did I also mention he was my god too? (I suppose this was sarcasm too)

"So finally, who are we free to critizise on this message board?
And give me one reason as to why think you are more suitable than anyone else to make that decision".
__________________
I never said anyone couldn't crticize him or anyone else. Did i say this in my original post?

Seriously, I can quote forever here... You took one sentence I wrote, and made it out to be something much larger. You know, perhaps being ignorant serves you well in Sweden, but maybe next time, you could ask me or anyone else to clarify what me/they meant. You'd probably find that you'd get a better straight up answer, with out all the insults thrown around.

[pbag]

Wow look at that crafty signature.. Haha, looks like someone struck a nerve.

Relax buddy, it's just an exchange between two posters. Happens all the time, so don't flatter yourself. No one cares, except for you (maybe to much considering the signature).

So, i think Georges is a boring fighter. Is that ok to say on the internet? Or do i have to fly over to tell him?

[RetardedChimp]

One time I asked Laraque face to face why he was such a boring fighter who only hugs and goes for take-downs.

[pbag]

Originally Posted by RetardedChimp

One time I asked Laraque face to face why he was such a boring fighter who only hugs and goes for take-downs.

Just to spare the board from the usual 10 more pages (which a post like this could eventually amass) of banter and harsh insults: Georges isn't a boring fighter per se, just his fights. And why that is... Is as always up for speculation.

Out of pure curiosity, he broke your fingers right? Or maybe chewed a piece of flesh off your face?

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by pbag

Wow look at that crafty signature.. Haha, looks like someone struck a nerve.

Relax buddy, it's just an exchange between two posters. Happens all the time, so don't flatter yourself. No one cares, except for you (maybe to much considering the signature).

So, i think Georges is a boring fighter. Is that ok to say on the internet? Or do i have to fly over to tell him?

"Wow look at that crafty signature.. Haha, looks like someone struck a nerve."

Haha sorry buddy, you never struck a nerve. Its not a signature. No idea why it appears that way. And you can think whatever you like about him, but the fact remains he's still a top 3 fighter in the NHL and thats all that matters.

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by RetardedChimp

One time I asked Laraque face to face why he was such a boring fighter who only hugs and goes for take-downs.

Oh yah, what'd he say???


(Sarcasm)

[pbag]

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

"Wow look at that crafty signature.. Haha, looks like someone struck a nerve."

Haha sorry buddy, you never struck a nerve. Its not a signature. No idea why it appears that way. And you can think whatever you like about him, but the fact remains he's still a top 3 fighter in the NHL and thats all that matters.

I'd rather say he's top 1-2 as far as capacity goes. The past season though, i don't think he was all that impressive.


Lol.. There's only one way to put up a signature. May i suggest reading the FAQ before playing around with the user settings.

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by pbag

I'd rather say he's top 1-2 as far as capacity goes. The past season though, i don't think he was all that impressive.


Lol.. There's only one way to put up a signature. May i suggest reading the FAQ before playing around with the user settings.

Yes agreed that he had a rather disappointing season. Injured too much (or is he going soft?) . This season will be a good test for him. I hope hes healthy and can prove hes still number 1 or atleast tied for number 1.

I never intended that to be a signature, haha. It just came out looking that way. I never wanted a signature and still do not want one. I just wrote what I worte, and it came out looking that way on the page.

[pbag]

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

Yes agreed that he had a rather disappointing season. Injured too much (or is he going soft?) . This season will be a good test for him. I hope hes healthy and can prove hes still number 1 or atleast tied for number 1.

I never intended that to be a signature, haha. It just came out looking that way. I never wanted a signature and still do not want one. I just wrote what I worte, and it came out looking that way on the page.

The guy has not turned soft(er), he's just getting older.

The guy is nurturing his contract with a bad pair of groins (or is it balls?).
I don't think fighting is his top priority at this point of his career. Staying healthy seems to be hard enough.

Nice signature..

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by pbag

The guy has not turned soft(er), he's just getting older.

The guy is nurturing his contract with a bad pair of groins (or is it balls?).
I don't think fighting is his top priority at this point of his career. Staying healthy seems to be hard enough.

Nice signature..

Nice signature.. Hahahaha

I hope Im wrong on the soft part as you say. But my feeling is , he'll nurse an injury as long as he can now-- even if its not a major one.

[fightingfan]

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

How the hell do you know the majority of fighters like to get hit???? Where are your facts??

You think all these tough guys --chose this job? Do you know anything about hockey?? You do realize that some of these guys get put in that roll because of their size etc... You also do realize that for others, its the only way they'll make it to the big leagues, right??

So , because Orr smiles after everyfight it means he likes to fight and doesn't mind to get hit?? Doesn't mind or he does not care to get hit? There is a difference .

So with your anology, ex.. a ju jitsui guy loves to get hit, so he stands there and says hit me, & trades punches with his/her opponent. Ok gotcha. The same must go for a wrestler, and of course we all know that every boxing match has been and always will be a bombs away brawl. I can't wait for the next fights..

are u bgl? i thought rugged was. anyway you do realize some fighters would be doing mma if they were not in the nhl? cote has come out and said that. so it kinda seems like some fighters like to get hit.

and yes i know some fighters enjoy getting hit or they would not be fighting dumbass

[ChiefJunior]

Originally Posted by fightingfan

are u bgl? i thought rugged was. anyway you do realize some fighters would be doing mma if they were not in the nhl? cote has come out and said that. so it kinda seems like some fighters like to get hit.

and yes i know some fighters enjoy getting hit or they would not be fighting dumbass

are u bgl?Nope. Don't think I ever said i was.

you do realize some fighters would be doing mma if they were not in the nhl? cote has come out and said that. Well since Cote has said it, then it must apply to some others right? Maybe 10% , 25% or even 60% of the fighters would be doing it eh!

Seriously, just because one trains MMA in the off season, does not mean they would be in MMA. There are loads of people who train in MMA, it does not mean they have the skill to fight in MMA. By this logic, all the old guys that trained boxing in the of season, could become or woulda become boxers if they did not hockey fight. Bob Probert vs Lennox Lewis??

so it kinda seems like some fighters like to get hit. So it kinda seems that they'd like to get hit now eh! This logic is based on the fact that some (Cote) said he would be in MMA? So all MMA fighters like to get hit or is it kinda like to?? Being in MMA has no correlation to liking to get hit. None whatsoever. How you think this astounds me, what is this based on?

[fightingfan]

Originally Posted by ChiefJunior

are u bgl?Nope. Don't think I ever said i was.

you do realize some fighters would be doing mma if they were not in the nhl? cote has come out and said that. Well since Cote has said it, then it must apply to some others right? Maybe 10% , 25% or even 60% of the fighters would be doing it eh!

Seriously, just because one trains MMA in the off season, does not mean they would be in MMA. There are loads of people who train in MMA, it does not mean they have the skill to fight in MMA. By this logic, all the old guys that trained boxing in the of season, could become or woulda become boxers if they did not hockey fight. Bob Probert vs Lennox Lewis??

so it kinda seems like some fighters like to get hit. So it kinda seems that they'd like to get hit now eh! This logic is based on the fact that some (Cote) said he would be in MMA? So all MMA fighters like to get hit or is it kinda like to?? Being in MMA has no correlation to liking to get hit. None whatsoever. How you think this astounds me, what is this based on?

you notice how no one is backing you up and everyone is arguing with you? its because you dont know shiat and your annoying. go away you dont know what your talking about