|
||||
|
Quote:
You know the funniest part about this whole thing is you were the only dumb kunt who couldn't figure out I was being a smart ass in the first post you quoted. Yet you have the nerve to question my intelligence and suggest that I am someone who would need to obtain a GED. Then to top it all off you suggested in your original reply that Steve Downie was like 4 different players and then stated why he wasn't like 3 of those same players you compared him to in the very same sentence and then you get all upset and call me hurtful names over me thanking you for clearing that up. Then to top off the original top off you suggested Downie has more offensive potential then Steve Ott and Cal Clutterbuck yet not as much offensive potential as Burrows but he will be most likely more like Tucker. Which to be quite honest makes no sense at all due to these facts. Darcy Tucker- In Jrs Tucker averaged 1.69pts per game. In the NHL he has averaged .52pts per game. Steve Ott- In Jrs Ott averaged 1.36pts per game. In the NHL he has averaged .34pts per game. Alexander Burrows - In Jrs he averaged .78pts per game. In the NHL he has averaged .36pts per game. Cal Clutterbuck- In Jrs he averaged .78pts per game. In the NHL he has averaged .23pts per game. Steve Downie- In Jrs he averaged 1.23pts per game. In the NHL he is averaging .29pts per game. Your post suggested that Burrows was the most gifted offensive player out of the bunch you compared him to yet this is not a fact. In fact Burrows is more compared to a player like Clutterbuck when you look at the numbers. However you also stated he would be more like Tucker because he wasn't as offensive as Burrows yet the numbers clearly show Tucker is the most offensive player out of the whole bunch so your statement that he would be like Tucker is actually wrong. Had you at anytime said he would be more like Steve Ott but with a little less offensive ability you would have made a close comparison but when you did compare the two players you suggested Downie was a better offensively, which he clearly is not according to the facts I have provided you at this time. Then to top off the original top off that was topped off by the last top off you, a person from Manitoba suggested that someone from Saskatchewan was a less educated person then yourself because you are from Manitoba. However this also is not a fact. Here is a link to Statistics Canada to prove that you are among the dumbest mother fukkers in all of Canada. http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/educ41b-eng.htm I for the record am not from Saskatchewan just so we are clear. If at any point during this lesson I have lost you or you have failed to follow along let me and I'll try and as you say "Tard" it up for you. P.S- Is there anyone else you would compare Downie to? |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Corpse For This Useful Post: | ||
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
____________________________________________ The above post was my opinion ONLY. Don't get your panties in a knot. Warning : sometimes I argue just for the sake of argument.WWBD FREE the FROG If you ain't '07 - you ain't schitt. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jack Schitt For This Useful Post: | ||
Corpse (11-07-2009) | ||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the Tom K clarify.... Honestly my first thought was Tom Kurvers, too old, I didn't think that said Tom K had done enough to warrant a nickname...
I was hoping that Downie would be a PJ Stock. Obviously, he hasn't. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Windsor Spitfires.....ALL DAY!! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|