Cheapest Current Player

[Boston Garden]

Originally Posted by fcm

You're just stating that he is a *****. My point is made and proven, yours is destroyed. Max Talbot has nothing to do in a thread that is supposed to talk about the cheapest player in the league.

You're the only one on your side, fuckstick.

You do realize that "cheapness" is subjective...correct? There is no sure fire way to determine who the cheapest player is. It's not that black and white, there's more to determining who's cheap than just throwing cheap hits. IMO being a pu$sy and being cheap goes hand in hand, when you do **** to agitate other team and refuse to drop the gloves I think you're cheap Ala Max Lapierre in his Montreal days (he actually drops the gloves here and there now).

I don't need or care for your approval on my stance, I never said he was the cheapest in the league I still think he's cheap though......if you can't deal with that than you can go pound sand.

[fcm]

Originally Posted by Boston Garden

You do realize that "cheapness" is subjective...correct?

No.

[Boston Garden]

Originally Posted by fcm

No.

Well then. There is no point in discussing any further.

[fcm]

I am aware, though, that the definition of cheapness, for you, changes if a player wears a Bruins uniform or a Flyers uniform (like Talbot).

[Boston Garden]

Originally Posted by fcm

I am aware, though, that the definition of cheapness, for you, changes if a player wears a Bruins uniform or a Flyers uniform (like Talbot).

Last word-You got it!

[RetardedChimp]

Originally Posted by fcm

No.

This is the same line of reasoning he used when he tried to justify voting for literally every Bruin nominated in the Year End Award Threads. It sounds just as awful now as it did then.

[hockeybuff]

Matt Cooke

[Boston Garden]

Originally Posted by fcm's Parrot

This is the same line of reasoning he used when he tried to justify voting for literally every Bruin nominated in the Year End Award Threads. It sounds just as awful now as it did then.

Well, you do understand that determining if a player is cheap or not, or if a player won a fight (in most instances), ect. is subjective? I'm pretty sure that's why this forum exists, there is no statistic for cheapness or how good a fighter somebody is-it's all opinionated.

Why do you think they're are threads with arguments about whether a certain hit was clean or not? Or threads about top 10 all-time fighters? Because they are subjective...like I said.

You can't argue about the best goal scorer in the history of the NHL. Statistics tell us it's Wayne Gretzky.

If I'm just supposed to take whatever you or whomever say as fact.....Then what's the point of this forum. I said what I thought about Max Talbot you said your part and we disagree. Big deal....move along.

[smashem]

This is to easy, Maxxi Padd. Concussion but yet can come back and be the best player on the Hab's FACT. #2, RC and FCM agreeing on something FACT. Pretty obvious you have been caught FACT.

[fcm]

Originally Posted by smashem

Maxxi Padd. Concussion but yet can come back and be the best player on the Hab's FACT.

How is that cheap?

[RetardedChimp]

Originally Posted by smashem

This is to easy, Maxxi Padd. Concussion but yet can come back and be the best player on the Hab's FACT. #2, RC and FCM agreeing on something FACT. Pretty obvious you have been caught FACT.

That totally makes sense.

[smashem]

Originally Posted by RetardedChimp

That totally makes sense.

About time you finally agreed with me