|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Assuming we're talking about a Rec game and not say, the NHL. I wouldn't call timeout. You've gotten this far without letting a goal in, I'd say the other team isn't likely to get a goal.
Moreover, if you think the other team might start **** and they're a little unbalanced, I wouldn't give them the opportunity to get more worked up. YMMV.
__________________
NHL 12 on the PS3 - S/N: antonio51867 PM me for a game! |
|
||||
|
Anytime it's a blowout game and there's very little time left, you gotta put your 4th liners out so that in case the going gets rough, you have guys out there who can handle it. A star player's health is a lot more concerning than whether or not the goalie got a shutout.
__________________
"You know what? I go into a fight, I'm going into a fight to hurt you. I'm not going in there to play patty cake." - Steve Mac |
|
||||
|
I think your asking for trouble if you put your best line on the bench. The other coach is more likly to do something stupid if he senses your giving up the game to protect the players. Non issue, keep the guys who you think will help the most on the ice, and assuming these are grown men command them not to retaliate. Yes, easer said than done...
__________________
Almost everything in sports should be reviewable. Get the call right! Buffalo sports are known for "Wide Right" and "No Goal." Let's change that! Member of the illustrious 8,000 post club "I've got to formulate a plot or I end up in jail or shot." The myth, the legend the icon, the incomparable shaud19. |
|
|||
|
I wouldn't put out my best players....I would put out my 3rd/4th line out there (assuming that they are excellent in defensive). That way, they definitely can stop them and get a shutout and/or stand up if they start any crap.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
From minor hockey to junior a, b or c to the beer leagues, guaranteed that if a team is losing 5-0 in the third with little time left, trouble will start. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|