James Wisniewski Suspended Eight Games

[canuckfan]

It was a nasty, dirty, terrible hit, and Wisniewski deserved a suspension. That being said though, I wonder what he would have gotten if he had pulled this crap 2 weeks ago, before the Cooke cheapshot on Savard.

If you ask me, this smacks of overkill, of a knee jerk reaction to all the negative reaction from not suspending Cooke. I was expecting at least 5 games, and I'm a little shocked at the 8 that was handed out today. But I think the league is trying to save a little face here and Wisniewski is serving as the perfect patsy.

In the end, I'm fine with it, because it was dirty as hell. I just wish we'd see some more rhyme or reason and consistency behind all the leagues decisions (and non-decisions).

[havoc00]

8 games?? lol what a joke this league cant die quick enough

[Sam1410]

Originally Posted by canuckfan

It was a nasty, dirty, terrible hit, and Wisniewski deserved a suspension. That being said though, I wonder what he would have gotten if he had pulled this crap 2 weeks ago, before the Cooke cheapshot on Savard.

If you ask me, this smacks of overkill, of a knee jerk reaction to all the negative reaction from not suspending Cooke. I was expecting at least 5 games, and I'm a little shocked at the 8 that was handed out today. But I think the league is trying to save a little face here and Wisniewski is serving as the perfect patsy.

In the end, I'm fine with it, because it was dirty as hell. I just wish we'd see some more rhyme or reason and consistency behind all the leagues decisions (and non-decisions).

I certainly agree with that thought.

I'd also point out that Wisniewski was already suspended two games earlier in the year for a head shot, so I'm assuming the NHL decided 5 wasn't enough for a second suspension.

I would disagree, this seemed like a max of 5 but as you note, who the hell can determine who will get what in terms of discipline right now.

[GCBC00]

At this point I think we all believe something was going to happen, but 8games was definitely more than I expected. As a Hawks fan, I expected some retribution for the hit on perry, but for Wisniewski to run Seabrook like that from the blueline was truly bush league. Then to claim, after the game, that he did nothing wrong, right after getting an assist on a game capping goal...what a c*ck sucker Wizz is. I truly respected him until last night. If you read his comments from last night, he justifies his hit and claims "he was the one that got cut by his own visor." Well, I don't feel sorry for you, Wizz. We could write forever on this one, but I won't give Wisniewski the credit. Bush league-nough said!

[JKidd]

8 games... I was thinking along the lines of 5, but his prior (that I forgot about) definitely makes it 8.

It was an ugly hit, and one that I normally wouldn't mind, if Seabrook had the puck. But, to take a run at a guy from that far away, and then jump at him when he doesn't have the puck? I'm all for giving back what was given, in this situation, but do it at least near the line, not a mile across it.

[canuckfan]

Originally Posted by Sam1410

I'd also point out that Wisniewski was already suspended two games earlier in the year for a head shot, so I'm assuming the NHL decided 5 wasn't enough for a second suspension.

Thats true, and I forgot about his two prior suspensions, especially the shot on Doan earlier this season - so you can bet for sure that factored into the league's final decision as a repeat offender.

[Purely_Purinton]

I was expecting either 4 or 5 games, especially after the bogus suspension for the Doan hit. 8 is absolutely rediculous and it's clear they're using a relative "nobody" as an example for their no tolerance for any over the top physical play. We're watching all physical play get sucked out of hockey folks, open up your eyes. It won't be 10 years before all open ice contact is banned.

And to back up my 3rd Liner Vs. Star Player argument, anybody remember this hit, which look at the sequence of events, and the hit given, and tell me its not the exact same scenario, with the difference being this was open ice, and no injury occured:

YouTube- Kovalevs Hit on Tucker

If my memory is correct, and a quick google search true, no suspension came of this blatant cheap shot.

And to all the Hawks fans crying about their untouchable star defensemen getting ran, go get a f*cking enforcer. This is what should happen to all teams too "talented" and "skilled" who are above carrying a policeman. I wish it happened every game to Detroit and Washington. Call up Ryan Flinn and play him 30 seconds a game and the cheap shots will go down real quick.

[MrFrost]

I gotta admit, you guys sure are some loyal people. I gave up watching this league lonnnnng ago due to retardation like this. You guys are die hards

[JKidd]

Originally Posted by Purely_Purinton

I was expecting either 4 or 5 games, especially after the bogus suspension for the Doan hit. 8 is absolutely rediculous and it's clear they're using a relative "nobody" as an example for their no tolerance for any over the top physical play. We're watching all physical play get sucked out of hockey folks, open up your eyes. It won't be 10 years before all open ice contact is banned.

And to back up my 3rd Liner Vs. Star Player argument, anybody remember this hit, which look at the sequence of events, and the hit given, and tell me its not the exact same scenario, with the difference being this was open ice, and no injury occured:
YouTube- Kovalevs Hit on Tucker

If my memory is correct, and a quick google search true, no suspension came of this blatant cheap shot.

And to all the Hawks fans crying about their untouchable star defensemen getting ran, go get a f*cking enforcer. This is what should happen to all teams too "talented" and "skilled" who are above carrying a policeman. I wish it happened every game to Detroit and Washington. Call up Ryan Flinn and play him 30 seconds a game and the cheap shots will go down real quick.

You can have the best one in the game, and that won't be a deterrent to some.

Why?

That instigator thing. Especially this late in the year, when some goons have already taken one or two through the year, and risk suspension (obviously, we don't give a **** about them being suspended and missing out on their 3 minutes a game, but from their point of view).

I hear what you're saying, and whole heartedly agree, but, the fact is that the league still handcuffs enforcers from doing their job.

[GCBC00]

Originally Posted by Purely_Purinton

I was expecting either 4 or 5 games, especially after the bogus suspension for the Doan hit. 8 is absolutely rediculous and it's clear they're using a relative "nobody" as an example for their no tolerance for any over the top physical play. We're watching all physical play get sucked out of hockey folks, open up your eyes. It won't be 10 years before all open ice contact is banned.

And to back up my 3rd Liner Vs. Star Player argument, anybody remember this hit, which look at the sequence of events, and the hit given, and tell me its not the exact same scenario, with the difference being this was open ice, and no injury occured:
YouTube- Kovalevs Hit on Tucker

If my memory is correct, and a quick google search true, no suspension came of this blatant cheap shot.

And to all the Hawks fans crying about their untouchable star defensemen getting ran, go get a f*cking enforcer. This is what should happen to all teams too "talented" and "skilled" who are above carrying a policeman. I wish it happened every game to Detroit and Washington. Call up Ryan Flinn and play him 30 seconds a game and the cheap shots will go down real quick.

I couldn't agree more with the Hawks comment. Trust me, we have been asking for a tough guy all season. We could have gotten Laraque for peanuts, and yes, Flinn would be an interesting call up. What about Eager? He has done nothing for his teamates...just collecting pay checks and talking. That's all we've seen from "big Ben." Big...only in his own head

[skacore]

Wow, 8 games is a lot. Then again you had to see this coming... and some people thought there would be no suspension, haha. He came charging in from the blue line on a star player, left his feet, got his hands/elbows up, and it was a HUGE interference call, a very, very dangerous play. Brains can be scrambled that way. I'm glad they got this one right

[chilly666]

Originally Posted by Purely_Purinton

And to all the Hawks fans crying about their untouchable star defensemen getting ran, go get a f*cking enforcer. This is what should happen to all teams too "talented" and "skilled" who are above carrying a policeman. I wish it happened every game to Detroit and Washington. Call up Ryan Flinn and play him 30 seconds a game and the cheap shots will go down real quick.

well its kind of hard to call up ryan flinn when he's not under contract for one and for two the hawks don't have the cap room to sign him. so what you just said is a moot point.

gcbc stop talking about the hawks getting laraque please...get his cock out of your mouth and quit saying he should have been brought. there is a reason the habs sent him home.

[leafs_fan77]

I love Seabrook, he is one of my favourite defenceman but 8 games might be a little much for Wiz. I mean, you don't give Cooke ****, but Wiz gets 8? I was maybe expecting 3. You never like to see a guy get hurt but I'm sure Seabrook will get his revenge.

EDIT: I forgot about the repeat offender bull****, so I guess it makes sense.

[Purely_Purinton]

Originally Posted by chilly666

well its kind of hard to call up ryan flinn when he's not under contract for one and for two the hawks don't have the cap room to sign him. so what you just said is a moot point.

gcbc stop talking about the hawks getting laraque please...get his cock out of your mouth and quit saying he should have been brought. there is a reason the habs sent him home.

I know he's on a PTO, and they did go and sign Jassen f*cking Cullimore to a two way deal, so no reason they couldn't do the same with Flinn, and send somebody else down, or use the extra room from Campbell going on IR, but you're right that it is a moot point because Bowman thinks that Eager, Boynton and Burish have teams sh*tting bricks when they walk in the United Center.

[SimonKO]

Originally Posted by jkidd

You can have the best one in the game, and that won't be a deterrent to some.

Why?

That instigator thing. Especially this late in the year, when some goons have already taken one or two through the year, and risk suspension (obviously, we don't give a **** about them being suspended and missing out on their 3 minutes a game, but from their point of view).

I hear what you're saying, and whole heartedly agree, but, the fact is that the league still handcuffs enforcers from doing their job.

And that's it... let the tough guys roll the pests.