Originally Posted by RedIce
I usually ignore idiots like that because they give me headaches, however i'd had a bit to drink tonight and could not resist arguing on twitter (pathetic, I know) with some moron who was convinced that we don't need Rosehill because we have Rinaldo. He even went as far as saying Rinaldo would have made Erskine pay for the hit on Simmonds, but Hendricks was simply the first guy he could get his hands on. Also included Talbot with Rinaldo and Simmonds as the reason why we don't "need any more toughness" because "the game has changed"...I thought my head was going to ****ing explode.
hahahaha, we destroyed that dude in that argument!
Also, as far as the article posted above, Lavy even seemed like he was on board with this move.