#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 06:37 PM
chilly666's Avatar
News Junkie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: my own little world
Posts: 27,200
Canucks and Mason Raymond Going to Arbitration

Quote:
The details of his contract just may not be the same.

For the first time in team history the Canucks have activated a mechanism that exists in the collective bargaining agreement where, in lieu of tendering a qualifying offer to Raymond, the team will invoke salary arbitration to have his salary adjusted.

Laurence Gilman, Canucks VP of hockey operations & assistant general manager, said Wednesday that due to Raymond’s dip in production over the last few seasons, the club will rework his contract.

The arbitration process, which will take place in Toronto between July 20 and August 4, is no different than a player filing for salary arbitration, as Raymond did in 2010.

It’s all part of the business, said Gilman.
Link

Quote:
The Vancouver Canucks filed 'cutdown' arbitration with forward Mason Raymond on Wednesday, instead of making a qualifying offer.

Last season, Raymond made $2.6 million and the arbitrator may not award a salary less than 85% of that amount or $2.21 million.
TSN

Last edited by chilly666; 06-13-2012 at 06:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chilly666 For This Useful Post:
straka91 (06-13-2012)
Advertisement
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 07:15 PM
Super All-Star
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,133
Im getting the impression Gillis is a dick to his players. For a measly 400k come on. If you he really wants to save cap space, he can loan the sisters to Europe and save 10 million on the cap. They will never get a cup with them on the roster.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 08:05 PM
chilly666's Avatar
News Junkie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: my own little world
Posts: 27,200
in this case i think its vancouver giving raymond a more team friendly contract considering he got a raise two years ago and hasn't scored as many points in the last two years as he did 3 years ago is a fair "request".

i don't think it's too far-fetched for most teams to do, it's just most are afraid to stick their necks out like this and pull the trigger for fear of a bad rep.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 08:50 PM
OilersHockey's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fergus, Ontario
Posts: 4,065
He's going to piss off the entire NHLPA for $400k? Are you fuc*ing kidding me?

Great message to send to the players as an organization...

Cost benefit guys... do the analysis.
__________________
MacT on the Oilers bottom six forwards: ""We had a lot of guys that the best they were going to be in any given game was a non-factor."

Maybe there is hope in Edmonton? Finally, a guy in charge who doesn't believe Lennart Petrell is a legitimate roster player.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:02 PM
HordiBrusk29's Avatar
General Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 36,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by straka91 View Post
Im getting the impression Gillis is a dick to his players.
Gillis is a dick period. Either way I don't blame him or the Canucks for not wanting to pay Raymond.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:16 PM
chilly666's Avatar
News Junkie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: my own little world
Posts: 27,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilersHockey View Post
He's going to piss off the entire NHLPA for $400k? Are you fuc*ing kidding me?

Great message to send to the players as an organization...

Cost benefit guys... do the analysis.
why should raymond get a 10% raise for a QO for his play over the two last seasons? he had less points into the past two seasons than he did in the prior season that got him the contract with a decent raise, then sucked.

good for gillis to say to the player, we don't think you gave us what we paid for, but you're still gonna get a contract from us again.

Last edited by chilly666; 06-13-2012 at 11:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2012, 06:07 PM
OilersHockey's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fergus, Ontario
Posts: 4,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by chilly666 View Post
why should raymond get a 10% raise for a QO for his play over the two last seasons? he had less points into the past two seasons than he did in the prior season that got him the contract with a decent raise, then sucked.

good for gillis to say to the player, we don't think you gave us what we paid for, but you're still gonna get a contract from us again.
I absolutely disagree, and so do 99.9% of the GMs in the league, which is why this is so rarely used...

So much to lose in reputation as an organization and so little to gain in the overall picture...

I understand your point and I do see where you are coming from... I just don`t think the risk/reward analysis says this is a good idea.
__________________
MacT on the Oilers bottom six forwards: ""We had a lot of guys that the best they were going to be in any given game was a non-factor."

Maybe there is hope in Edmonton? Finally, a guy in charge who doesn't believe Lennart Petrell is a legitimate roster player.

Last edited by OilersHockey; 06-14-2012 at 06:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2012, 06:21 PM
chilly666's Avatar
News Junkie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: my own little world
Posts: 27,200
well that's fair...but its well known that gillis doesn't give two ****s what people think of him, also the fact that doing this can either open up the whole salary if raymond (has the ability too) walks away from the arbitrators ruling or at least save in upwards of 600k which could bring in another roster player or give them cap space to make a trade at the deadline.

i get what you're saying, but logically knowing what gillis is about and who he has been in the media since joining the canucks, this move isn't really shocking imo.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2012, 06:49 PM
OilersHockey's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fergus, Ontario
Posts: 4,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by chilly666 View Post
well that's fair...but its well known that gillis doesn't give two ****s what people think of him, also the fact that doing this can either open up the whole salary if raymond (has the ability too) walks away from the arbitrators ruling or at least save in upwards of 600k which could bring in another roster player or give them cap space to make a trade at the deadline.

i get what you're saying, but logically knowing what gillis is about and who he has been in the media since joining the canucks, this move isn't really shocking imo.
I hear ya... I do applaud him for being willing to use this avenue...

I wish WAY more GMs would run this like a business instead of making a mockery of the business side of the game - things like Dipietro's contract, etc make the game a laughing stock at times.
__________________
MacT on the Oilers bottom six forwards: ""We had a lot of guys that the best they were going to be in any given game was a non-factor."

Maybe there is hope in Edmonton? Finally, a guy in charge who doesn't believe Lennart Petrell is a legitimate roster player.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OilersHockey For This Useful Post:
chilly666 (06-14-2012)
Reply

Tags
arbitration, mason raymond, vancouver canucks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.