|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Opinion on Shootouts? | |||
| Like them, great move by the NHL |
|
10 | 16.39% |
| Don't care, they "solve" a tie and thats it |
|
17 | 27.87% |
| Hate them, one of the worst changes |
|
19 | 31.15% |
| No opinion |
|
1 | 1.64% |
| Sick of them, go back to ties |
|
14 | 22.95% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
||||
|
It's kind of unfair like in soccer with PK's but i remember eklund making a good suggestion with having each team have a PP and do it kinda like college football. I like that idea better because it makes it more of a team thing than individual.
__________________
Tough. What are they gonna do, call their mom? This is hockey. They'll get over it." - Ray Shero |
|
||||
|
Added a poll.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: Jkidd2624 Favorite in game audio Boxing Central RIP Bob "Probie" Probert - 7/5/2010 RIP Derek "Boogie Man" Boogaard - 5/13/2011 |
|
||||
|
I like it. It makes the game a lil' bit more exciting, and can find an other utility to offensive-gifted players who plays on the 3rd of 4rth line.
__________________
Old Time Hockey ![]() "A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - The Manassa Mauler Jack Dempsey
|
|
||||
|
The continious 3 on 3 would be ****ing exhausting for the players and plays would be a lot different...
__________________
Old Time Hockey ![]() "A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - The Manassa Mauler Jack Dempsey
|
|
||||
|
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Continuous OT is not feasible in the regular season, and it's better than a game ending in a tie.
This is also coming from a player who was 3 for 4 in shootout opportunities this year.
__________________
I'm a complete player, my goals and fights are equally as ugly. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdZdg53A83c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if8X3-9-S6g |
|
|||
|
It adds excitement BUT I don't understand why they decide games of such a team sport with individual efforts ? Obviously the NHL only did it as a cheap attempt to gain fans because they'll never ever use it come playoff time. Its exciting but I could care less if they changed it and went 4 on 4 for 10 minutes.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Flyers and I forget the other team had an OT where penalties had it 3 on 3 for about a minute or so and it was comical. It was like the players had no idea what to do and were dumping it in and just sending in one guy to forecheck while keeping two back until the minors were up.
|
|
||||
|
I used to enjoy the shootouts. Now, I'm quite sick of them. Don't get me wrong, I've got to watch some great shoot out specialists (cough Petteri Nummelin cough) and some great shoot out goalies, but they don't have the same excitement they once had. I'm not saying anytime something gets dull it needs to be replaced, but the individualism that a shoot out brings to a "team paramount" game is quite sickening.
I'd say go to 4-4 for 10 minutes, and end it in a tie if there is no scoring. Give the guys a chance to get something going past 5 minutes, and give the coaches a harder time to simply play for a tie with a short 5 minute overtime.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter: Jkidd2624 Favorite in game audio Boxing Central RIP Bob "Probie" Probert - 7/5/2010 RIP Derek "Boogie Man" Boogaard - 5/13/2011 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|