|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who wins the series | |||
| Coyotes |
|
12 | 26.09% |
| Kings |
|
34 | 73.91% |
| Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hence the D on the Yotes has an incredible amount of pressure put on them. they are actually very well rounded and quite good. Your welcome L.A. sports fan. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to canuck2 For This Useful Post: | ||
Treehugger (05-14-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Los Angeles Kings 2012 Stanley Cup champions! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to brymaster1 For This Useful Post: | ||
Lindros88 (05-14-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I wish Doan would play more often with an edge. He has at times in the playoffs for sure but the guy is a beast when he gets a bit angry. He's not a dirty player. He's a rock. I love how he bitch slapped Richards to the ice yesterday. Richards came up crying. That was sweet. And you're complaining? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Reread my post. The lack of puck handling/possession and forecheck by the Yotes puts an awful lot of pressure on the coyotes defense. The coyotes D lead the NHL in post season points. |
|
||||
|
Just because their D leads the NHL in point doesn't mean they are great in their own zone. Phoenix actually reminds me a lot of St. Louis, their defensive stats were padded because of how well their goaltenting was during the season. And before you say anything about the Kings regular season, yes Quick was a huge reason they made it to the playoffs, but their D has ben great all year long.
__________________
Los Angeles Kings 2012 Stanley Cup champions! Last edited by brymaster1; 05-14-2012 at 03:25 PM. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to brymaster1 For This Useful Post: | ||
chilly666 (05-14-2012), lakingsfan19 (05-14-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe your on to something with the forwards not coming back and helping out or getting in the lanes so the "D" can move the puck up quickly. I did notice it seemed the Yotes "D" like to skate the puck out. Whatever it is, it will have to be better. I do think Tippett is cable and will address it before game 2. Game 2 will tell us a lot, Yotes win and everyone will forget game 1.. Kings win and this series could be over quick.
__________________
With a wealth of disappointment stacking high. On a foundation built on who's to blame. It's leveled when you find the victims. And the perpetrators are one in the same. And I'm standing on the edge of oblivion, Standing on the edge of oblivion. And I'll put my best foot forward, Put my best foot forward. - The Briggs |
|
|||
|
Quote:
What player isnt dirty? The few Lady Byng players maybe? Winning is seeing how much you can get away with. Kings in 6. Yotes are resilient bastards. Last edited by straka91; 05-14-2012 at 03:27 PM. |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to straka91 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
BUt as I tried to explain twice to brzmaster the coyotes forwards are not a puck possesion bunch, nor do they forecheck particularily well. That's not a good combination and puts an awful lot of pressure on the D. The Kings, much like the Hawks are great at puck possession. In other words they have the puck a lot. for the amount of pressure exerted on them the Coyotes D is actually very solid. Lot of good two way guys, tough too. but when you're on the defense a lot your going to turn the puck over and make mistakes. trust me if the coyotes had an average D they would get blown out, wether they had Mike Smith in net or not. The offense I mention from the coyotes D is just a good bonus and proves how good two way they are. The Kings looked very very good last night, I cant imagine the Yotes beating these guys. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to canuck2 For This Useful Post: | ||
lakingsfan19 (05-14-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However you are over exaggerating how "dirty" he really is. As a matter of fact I'd argue Doan is too nice most of the time. Sometimes I wish he would play with more of a chip on his shoulder and be more aggressive and assertive. Quote:
Regardless my point is there are a lot more pros when it comes to Shane Doan than there are cons. That right there should shed some light as to why many other hockey fans like the guy. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
He's been suspended twice for dirty cheap shots. The guy is a dirty player. He hides behind a visor. Some call that playing with an edge but I call it being a pu$$y. Fock Doan, he's been a loser his whole career, he never wins diddily squat and he wilts in the playoffs, averaging quite a bit less ppg when crunch time rolls around but he's usually at bible summer camp during the playoffs. There are 50 players I'd pick before him when starting a team, maybe more. I've probably forgotten more about hockey than most fans know and it's easy for me to see what kind of player he is and isn't. I think it's hilarious when people root for dirty players, shows how hypocritical they are. I should ask even though I'll get some retarded response but when was it ok for a player to elbow a guy in the head and then fight someone else who is pissed off about it? I must have been absent the day they were teaching respect for other players. That's focked up.
__________________
Elusive Member of The 3,000 Post Club! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to mikebflorida For This Useful Post: | ||
mike56 (05-15-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
John 3:16 "its him!!" |
| The Following User Says Thank You to mike56 For This Useful Post: | ||
R.Middleton (05-15-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
That happened a long time ago....
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to HordiBrusk29 For This Useful Post: | ||
R.Middleton (05-15-2012) | ||
|
||||
|
Come on now guys, everything I said was true.
Doan is a decent player, never said he was a bad player, just said he was a dirty player. You guys over rate him badly. That's not retarded, it's true. I'd make a list of players I'd pick long before him when making a team but why bother? I'm not going to change your minds apparently. The facts speak for themselves, he's been suspended twice before, probably gotten away with numerous other questionable plays in his career, and he wilts in the playoffs. The stats don't lie. He's been playing with the franchise for like 17 years or something and has made the playoffs 7 times including this year and has 26 points in 51 playoff games, about a half point per game while he has about .75 points per game in the regular season. So, if he even gets his team to the playoffs, he wilts. He's also been a minus player most of his career, -25 to be exact. Also has two 3 game suspensions for dirty hits. What? Were they accidents? Hate to bombard you with facts but there they are. I think he's highly over rated, just my opinion. Onward
__________________
Elusive Member of The 3,000 Post Club! |
|
||||
|
Today is the day for fights. With an S.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to NickDoh For This Useful Post: | ||
lakingsfan19 (05-15-2012) | ||
![]() |
| Tags |
| conference finals, los angeles kings, nhl, phoenix coyotes |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|