Go Back   hockeyfights.com forums > NHL Forums > NHL Chat

View Poll Results: Who wins the series
Coyotes 12 26.09%
Kings 34 73.91%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 01:53 PM
thepolishkid88's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,022
First off I'd like to say I think the winner of this series wins the cup. With that said I really think the Kings have a great team, but at the end of the day I'd say majority of the media and hockey world is underestimating the Yotes.

So I took the Yotes to win in 7 games.
__________________
Tough. What are they gonna do, call their mom? This is hockey. They'll get over it." - Ray Shero
Advertisement
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 01:59 PM
canuck2's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: phoenix arizona via Thunder Bay Ont.
Posts: 14,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakingsfan19 View Post
I still can't understand why PHX defense has got a lot of credit before this game. I thought they always give up a ton of shots and Smith bails them out.

Ekman-Larrson was having the most problems last night and was a -3. I thought old man Morris was their best defenseman on the ice.

Like Tippett said last night, The Yotes can't be out played and expect to win like some of their other playoff games. They need to clean up their defense and try to figure out The Kings forecheck, Smith can't win them this series. If they don't, this can be as Quick as the Blues series.

I think Tippett will have them playing better in game 2... But, the Blues did try to figure it out and they couldn't. We shall see.
The game is about puck possession. The coyote forewards are not that skilled. They dont particulariy forecheck that well.

Hence the D on the Yotes has an incredible amount of pressure put on them. they are actually very well rounded and quite good.

Your welcome L.A. sports fan.
The Following User Says Thank You to canuck2 For This Useful Post:
Treehugger (05-14-2012)
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 02:46 PM
brymaster1's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuck2 View Post
The game is about puck possession. The coyote forewards are not that skilled. They dont particulariy forecheck that well.

Hence the D on the Yotes has an incredible amount of pressure put on them. they are actually very well rounded and quite good.

Your welcome L.A. sports fan.
Sure didn't play like it last night, Klesla was trying to catch up to people the entire game, he was always out of place. The only reason Morris is getting any positive attention is because he scored a once in a career goal, he had multiple turnovers, Yandle was average, and OEL was was invisible. Maybe the Kings forecheck is just really that good, seeing as they made the even better Blues defense look non-existent for the first few games.
__________________
Los Angeles Kings 2012 Stanley Cup champions!
The Following User Says Thank You to brymaster1 For This Useful Post:
Lindros88 (05-14-2012)
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 02:52 PM
canuck2's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: phoenix arizona via Thunder Bay Ont.
Posts: 14,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebflorida View Post
Doan is a dirty a$$hole. Not sure why people like the guy. He's dirtier than Paulina Gretzkys snatch.
You must watch very little hockey.

I wish Doan would play more often with an edge. He has at times in the playoffs for sure but the guy is a beast when he gets a bit angry.

He's not a dirty player. He's a rock. I love how he bitch slapped Richards to the ice yesterday. Richards came up crying. That was sweet.

And you're complaining?
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 02:54 PM
canuck2's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: phoenix arizona via Thunder Bay Ont.
Posts: 14,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by brymaster1 View Post
Sure didn't play like it last night, Klesla was trying to catch up to people the entire game, he was always out of place. The only reason Morris is getting any positive attention is because he scored a once in a career goal, he had multiple turnovers, Yandle was average, and OEL was was invisible. Maybe the Kings forecheck is just really that good, seeing as they made the even better Blues defense look non-existent for the first few games.
One game and your sure surmise an awful lot.

Reread my post. The lack of puck handling/possession and forecheck by the Yotes puts an awful lot of pressure on the coyotes defense.

The coyotes D lead the NHL in post season points.
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 03:09 PM
brymaster1's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuck2 View Post
One game and your sure surmise an awful lot.

Reread my post. The lack of puck handling/possession and forecheck by the Yotes puts an awful lot of pressure on the coyotes defense.

The coyotes D lead the NHL in post season points.
Just because their D leads the NHL in point doesn't mean they are great in their own zone. Phoenix actually reminds me a lot of St. Louis, their defensive stats were padded because of how well their goaltenting was during the season. And before you say anything about the Kings regular season, yes Quick was a huge reason they made it to the playoffs, but their D has ben great all year long.
__________________
Los Angeles Kings 2012 Stanley Cup champions!

Last edited by brymaster1; 05-14-2012 at 03:25 PM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to brymaster1 For This Useful Post:
chilly666 (05-14-2012), lakingsfan19 (05-14-2012)
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 03:13 PM
lakingsfan19's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Bay
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuck2 View Post
One game and your sure surmise an awful lot.

Reread my post. The lack of puck handling/possession and forecheck by the Yotes puts an awful lot of pressure on the coyotes defense.

The coyotes D lead the NHL in post season points.
That is not what what I was talking about. I know they are a good offensive bunch on "D". I am talking about limiting shots and playing "D". They seem to give up a lot of shots and turn the puck over a lot. I didn't watch every Yotes playoff game, but the ones I did, it seemed the shots against was always high.

Maybe your on to something with the forwards not coming back and helping out or getting in the lanes so the "D" can move the puck up quickly. I did notice it seemed the Yotes "D" like to skate the puck out. Whatever it is, it will have to be better. I do think Tippett is cable and will address it before game 2.

Game 2 will tell us a lot, Yotes win and everyone will forget game 1.. Kings win and this series could be over quick.
__________________
With a wealth of disappointment stacking high. On a foundation built on who's to blame. It's leveled when you find the victims. And the perpetrators are one in the same. And I'm standing on the edge of oblivion, Standing on the edge of oblivion. And I'll put my best foot forward, Put my best foot forward. - The Briggs
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 03:22 PM
Super All-Star
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebflorida View Post
Doan is a dirty a$$hole. Not sure why people like the guy. He's dirtier than Paulina Gretzkys snatch.
His hockey IQ is through the roof, one of the smartest hockey minds out there... He is classy off the ice... He has stayed with the same organization for his entire career. A lot of it in PHX of all places... When he wants to he can become a checking machine...

What player isnt dirty? The few Lady Byng players maybe? Winning is seeing how much you can get away with.


Kings in 6. Yotes are resilient bastards.

Last edited by straka91; 05-14-2012 at 03:27 PM.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to straka91 For This Useful Post:
Baronking (05-15-2012), HordiBrusk29 (05-14-2012), mikebflorida (05-15-2012)
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 04:04 PM
canuck2's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: phoenix arizona via Thunder Bay Ont.
Posts: 14,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakingsfan19 View Post
That is not what what I was talking about. I know they are a good offensive bunch on "D". I am talking about limiting shots and playing "D". They seem to give up a lot of shots and turn the puck over a lot. I didn't watch every Yotes playoff game, but the ones I did, it seemed the shots against was always high.

Maybe your on to something with the forwards not coming back and helping out or getting in the lanes so the "D" can move the puck up quickly. I did notice it seemed the Yotes "D" like to skate the puck out. Whatever it is, it will have to be better. I do think Tippett is cable and will address it before game 2.

Game 2 will tell us a lot, Yotes win and everyone will forget game 1.. Kings win and this series could be over quick.
I realize that them leading the league in points has nothing to do with what you were talking about.

BUt as I tried to explain twice to brzmaster the coyotes forwards are not a puck possesion bunch, nor do they forecheck particularily well. That's not a good combination and puts an awful lot of pressure on the D. The Kings, much like the Hawks are great at puck possession. In other words they have the puck a lot.
for the amount of pressure exerted on them the Coyotes D is actually very solid. Lot of good two way guys, tough too. but when you're on the defense a lot your going to turn the puck over and make mistakes. trust me if the coyotes had an average D they would get blown out, wether they had Mike Smith in net or not.
The offense I mention from the coyotes D is just a good bonus and proves how good two way they are.
The Kings looked very very good last night, I cant imagine the Yotes beating these guys.
The Following User Says Thank You to canuck2 For This Useful Post:
lakingsfan19 (05-14-2012)
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 04:06 PM
HordiBrusk29's Avatar
General Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 36,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebflorida View Post
I didn't say he wouldn't answer the bell, I just said he was dirty.
At times yes. You have to be to some extent when you are a physical player.
However you are over exaggerating how "dirty" he really is. As a matter of fact I'd argue Doan is too nice most of the time. Sometimes I wish he would play with more of a chip on his shoulder and be more aggressive and assertive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebflorida
He's an Iginla wannabe, a guy who fights because he just elbowed someone in the head where Iginla fights to rally his team or because he threw a big, clean hit. Big difference.
I will agree with that statement. Ironically both guys are close friends and former teammates. Doan doesn't have that nasty edge that Iginla does.

Regardless my point is there are a lot more pros when it comes to Shane Doan than there are cons. That right there should shed some light as to why many other hockey fans like the guy.
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2012, 11:59 PM
mikebflorida's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 4,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuck2 View Post
You must watch very little hockey.

I wish Doan would play more often with an edge. He has at times in the playoffs for sure but the guy is a beast when he gets a bit angry.

He's not a dirty player. He's a rock. I love how he bitch slapped Richards to the ice yesterday. Richards came up crying. That was sweet.

And you're complaining?

He's been suspended twice for dirty cheap shots. The guy is a dirty player. He hides behind a visor. Some call that playing with an edge but I call it being a pu$$y. Fock Doan, he's been a loser his whole career, he never wins diddily squat and he wilts in the playoffs, averaging quite a bit less ppg when crunch time rolls around but he's usually at bible summer camp during the playoffs. There are 50 players I'd pick before him when starting a team, maybe more.

I've probably forgotten more about hockey than most fans know and it's easy for me to see what kind of player he is and isn't. I think it's hilarious when people root for dirty players, shows how hypocritical they are.

I should ask even though I'll get some retarded response but when was it ok for a player to elbow a guy in the head and then fight someone else who is pissed off about it? I must have been absent the day they were teaching respect for other players. That's focked up.
__________________
Elusive Member of The 3,000 Post Club!
The Following User Says Thank You to mikebflorida For This Useful Post:
mike56 (05-15-2012)
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2012, 12:45 AM
mike56's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebflorida View Post
He's been suspended twice for dirty cheap shots. The guy is a dirty player. He hides behind a visor. Some call that playing with an edge but I call it being a pu$$y. Fock Doan, he's been a loser his whole career, he never wins diddily squat and he wilts in the playoffs, averaging quite a bit less ppg when crunch time rolls around but he's usually at bible summer camp during the playoffs. There are 50 players I'd pick before him when starting a team, maybe more.

I've probably forgotten more about hockey than most fans know and it's easy for me to see what kind of player he is and isn't. I think it's hilarious when people root for dirty players, shows how hypocritical they are.

I should ask even though I'll get some retarded response but when was it ok for a player to elbow a guy in the head and then fight someone else who is pissed off about it? I must have been absent the day they were teaching respect for other players. That's focked up.
OK,You have now just cossed over to full on retard.
__________________
John 3:16

"its him!!"
The Following User Says Thank You to mike56 For This Useful Post:
R.Middleton (05-15-2012)
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2012, 04:20 AM
HordiBrusk29's Avatar
General Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 36,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike56 View Post
OK,You have now just cossed over to full on retard.
That happened a long time ago....
The Following User Says Thank You to HordiBrusk29 For This Useful Post:
R.Middleton (05-15-2012)
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2012, 10:05 AM
mikebflorida's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 4,025
Come on now guys, everything I said was true.

Doan is a decent player, never said he was a bad player, just said he was a dirty player.

You guys over rate him badly. That's not retarded, it's true.

I'd make a list of players I'd pick long before him when making a team but why bother? I'm not going to change your minds apparently. The facts speak for themselves, he's been suspended twice before, probably gotten away with numerous other questionable plays in his career, and he wilts in the playoffs. The stats don't lie. He's been playing with the franchise for like 17 years or something and has made the playoffs 7 times including this year and has 26 points in 51 playoff games, about a half point per game while he has about .75 points per game in the regular season.

So, if he even gets his team to the playoffs, he wilts. He's also been a minus player most of his career, -25 to be exact.

Also has two 3 game suspensions for dirty hits. What? Were they accidents?

Hate to bombard you with facts but there they are. I think he's highly over rated, just my opinion.

Onward
__________________
Elusive Member of The 3,000 Post Club!
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2012, 01:21 PM
NickDoh's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Da Yooperland
Posts: 9,451
Today is the day for fights. With an S.
The Following User Says Thank You to NickDoh For This Useful Post:
lakingsfan19 (05-15-2012)
Closed Thread

Tags
conference finals, los angeles kings, nhl, phoenix coyotes

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.