View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2013, 07:42 PM
tim13's Avatar
tim13 tim13 is offline
Super All-Star
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by pesadillamal View Post
I don't let the linesmen determine whether it was a TKO or not so them jumping in has nothing to do with it. If the player takes a punch and can't continue because of the punch then I am inclined to give out a TKO. There is a lot of room between a KO and a KD, and there are many KD's where the fighter gets right up ready to go again. Might as well give the fighter something for ending the fight with a punch.
Fair enough I guess, but for me simply saying "Brown landed a monster shot that ended the fight" more than suffices. When the term TKO comes into play, everyone has their own definition and it turns to arguing over semantics when there's no need to.

It's a bastardization of a term that has a definite meaning. Everyone knows what a boxing TKO is. It's easily define-able. I have no real beef with people using the term, this is just a thought that always crosses my mind when people are arguing over whether something was or wasn't a TKO.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tim13 For This Useful Post:
pesadillamal (02-26-2013), Phila26Flyers (02-26-2013)