lock outs are boring, so i'm going to pretend i care about this extension for one second. if you'll indulge me:
Originally Posted by BROKEN*ORBITAL
There are more of "those types" of players in the league than there are like Lucic. He's a good player, and can bring an entirely different element that none of the players you listed can match. In a game turning as p*ssy as the NHL is, guys like Lucic are more of a commodity now than ever.
if the NHL is 'turning *****' (which i almost completely agree with) then wouldn't it make even less sense to sign him to this big of a deal? i mean, i get why this site likes him and it's the same reason i like him, but if the league is getting 'more *****', wouldn't that make this contract worse, not better?
again, i get why we
like it, but to me, it's a good team over paying a fan favorite by too much, just because he's a fan favorite (obviously he is on this site, but i'm not sure if a non-hockey fightin' B's fan likes this price tag. which i suppose doesn't matter, but whatever) which wouldn't bother me one bit, if it wasn't for this ****ing lock out ruining my enjoyment.
why the fu
ck can't i say pu
ssy? what the fu
ck sense does that make?