Listen I don't want to bore anyone but my point is this. Use the same logic on Fotiu that your using to belittle Carkner. If it proves Carkner is worthless because they didn't play him in a important playoff game then Fotiu is worthless too because he didn't play in more that half the Ranger playoff games while he was there. If it shows that Carkner is not important because the team let him go as a UFA ,then Fotiu couldn't have been this great impact player because they let him go TWICE for nothing. Another thing if you can make the laughable statement that Fotiu could have been the difference against the Great 4 in a row Habs couldn't Carkner have been the difference in game 7 ? Remember the Rangers beat the tough Islanders without Fotiu the Sens lost to the Rangers without Carkner. Carkner did what a good enforcer is supposed to do. He sparked his team by fighting. Use the same logic on both and your boy doesn't look so important does he ?
Last edited by Johnny Pie; 07-13-2012 at 09:03 PM.