Quote:
Originally Posted by T800m101
I think it's really subjective. I mean, would you take a 20 year old Simon, or a 30 year old Simon? I'd take the 20 year old Simon, hands down. He was tearing up the league when he first came in. That's not to say he wasn't a great fighter at 30....
|
I rate fighters when they where in the peak of their careers when judging them on how good they where... It's like saying Brashear when he was with Montreal he was the same fighter he was when at Vancouver or Philadelphia a few years later, he was not..
Or was
Eric Cairns the same standard of fighter when he was with Rangers than when he was with the Islanders, He was not. He was much better when he was a few years older and stronger and wiser...