So they wear visors, neither of them fight and it was Hagman's first fight in 8 NHL seasons. Should Hagman not wear it in the off chance that he ever gets in one again? NO. Krajicek doesn't fight either should he not wear it in the off chance that he gets in one in the near future? NO. Guys like Boogaard and Laraque don't wear them for obvious reasons such as getting more air time on this website the day after a fight than they do ice time over their career. Good on hagman for standing up for himself after a stupid play by Krajicek rather than making Orr and Konopka punch each other out for no reason. Keep on yapping about how boring a fight it was what did you expect? honestly. Someone mentioned that they hope Downie took note I seriously hope youre kidding.
For those who think that fighting with visors is lame, it will be forced upon the NHL sooner or later considering the AHL players are forced to wear visors. LAME. Nice to see hagman stick up for hinself here. He is not a fighter and it showed, but kodos for dropping the mits.
wasnt a good fight but im surprised Hagman didnt get anything extra for dropping the gloves first cuz Krajicek was kinda surprised it seemed like. but i dont get why people say tht when players have visors and they get into a fight that they are cheap. Krajicek isnt a fighter and didnt look like he rlly wanted to fight so people shouldnt call him cheap for that. and for the take down he made it wasnt rlly tht bad. ive seen alot worse in hockey and it wasnt rlly tht cheap of a hit. ill agree it was uncalled for but wasnt tht bad in my opinion.