Mattias Ohlund vs Dion Phaneuf

Nov 8, 2007 2pd 09:16

2007-2008 Regular Season

Date / Time	Away / Home Team	Away / Home Player
Nov 8, 2007	Vancouver Canucks	Mattias Ohlund
2pd 09:16	Calgary Flames	Dion Phaneuf
A scrum develops the Flames end and the two come out of it with their gloves dropped and ahold on one another. Ohlund throws two rights and a body shot. Phaneuf ties Ohlund up and then connects with three straight lefts. Ohlund misses with a right cross. They exchange short rights before Phaneuf unleashes a flurry of eight unanswered uppercuts and overhand rights. Ohlund lands a right to the side of Phaneuf's head and they wrestle around until the linesmen decide to come in and end the fight. Other Penalties: Phaneuf received a roughing; Matt Cooke a boarding.

Your vote

You must login to vote.

You can sign up for free if you do not have an account already.

Results

Dion Phaneuf		74.5%
Mattias Ohlund		15.9%
Draw		9.7%
From 145 votes with an average rating of 6.2

User Reviews

Posted by JoeSixpack on Nov 9, 2007 at 11:56 PM agree

I was at the game as well. Dion went after Cooke, but he ran like the typical chicken turd he is. I take that back... he's not a chicken turd, he's the flecks of black crap in the chicken turd. While Cooke was hiding, Ohlund jumped in and grabbed Dion, so Dion started chucking them. Why aren't you idiot Nuck fans whining about Ohlund starting a fight with his visor on?

Easy win Dion. "He was feeding Ohlund his lunch". Yes, Ohlund landed a (as in "one") good punch, but Dion hit him with many, many punches to the head and face.

Cooke only fights players like Moore (and loses that one too if I recall correctly). Aside from Scrotini, he might be the biggest coward in the league.

Posted by Dion_Phaneuf3 on Nov 9, 2007 at 1:11 PM agree

Dion is the man Standing up for his mates

Posted by natural420 on Nov 9, 2007 at 4:36 PM agree

anyone who says cookes hit wasnt dirty is a moron
anyone who says phaneuf handpicked ohlund is a moron. he went after cooke and ohlund came to cookes defence cause cooke dosent fight
anyone who think phaneuf didnt land is a moron. he won that fight handly. love him or hate him, dont deny it
anyone who thinks phaneuf is cheap for fighting with a visor is a moron. it was a spur of the moment scrap because of cookes bs. phanuef like iginla is told not to fight, but sometimes he has to. but he isnt suposed to be a fighter cause he is one of the top guys for the flames and they dont want him off the ice for a lengthly period of time. lots of people fight with visors and most lose em, dont use it as an excuse to hate on phaneuf, its a tired excuse......

Posted by Manchoo on Nov 9, 2007 at 4:17 PM agree

i don't see how you can call down dion for wearing the visor on this, it wasn't a straight up fight, it was a scrum fight. if you go to take off your helmate you are risking taking 2 or 3 shots to the face because your hand is in use. Either way, dion on that one hands down.

Posted by SCOTTSO on Nov 9, 2007 at 5:20 PM agree

EASY WIN FOR DP

Posted by bostonrs555 on Nov 9, 2007 at 5:48 PM agree

Phaneuf hit the Swede with so many rights he started begging for lefts!!!!!!
----in Sweden, Ohlund is a heavyweight feared throughout the land, but here
the Swedish Meatball is served a plate of Phaneuf!!!! yuck, bad aftertaste!!!