Kevin Bieksa vs Viktor Stalberg

Apr 19, 2011 3pd 16:20

2010-2011 Postseason

Date / Time Away / Home Team Away / Home Player
Apr 19, 2011 Vancouver Canucks Kevin Bieksa
3pd 16:20 Chicago Blackhawks Viktor Stalberg
Other Penalties: Niklas Hjalmarsson received a roughing.

Your vote

You must login to vote.

You can sign up for free if you do not have an account already.

Results

Kevin Bieksa 86.2%
Draw 8.4%
Viktor Stalberg 5.4%
From 167 votes with an average rating of 5.0

User Reviews

Posted by The IRISH Mick on Apr 20, 2011 at 9:49 AM agree disagree
I for one didn't get to see the game, which is really sucks. It would of been great seening the Hawks win one.... Reading all of the comments here it seems to me that most of you didn"t really look at the replay close enough. Stalberg slashed Lapierre after Lapierre slashedf him for minor check then Stalberg went on to tripp Lapierre not slash him. Then your ***** ass player Bieksa took acception to that.....but we all know he was just pissed because he just got flatten by Stalberg. All of you dumbass talking about how Stalberg shouldn't of been throwing his weight around when your up 6-1......lastime I checked you don't stop playing until the horn blows. But I will say this, I could not believe that Campoli didnt unload on Torres the other night when he hit Seabrook.....I was more pissed at that then the hit....You have to stick up for your top players and every NHL player knows that its just to bad the Team I love didn't follow thru.
Posted by Westcoast_Goon on Apr 20, 2011 at 1:43 AM agree disagree
Stalberg poked the sleeping bear and got absolutely destroyed.

Bieksa with the easy win.

Stalberg's shield didn't stop him from leaking blood all over the place.

Boom.
Posted by chelios247 on Apr 20, 2011 at 10:56 AM agree disagree
Should have been an instigator. Van sucks and will not win the cup this year. Maybe next year? Will they even be able to field this team next season? Van is full of cheese. Their fans are corny as sh!t.
Posted by allan1 on Apr 20, 2011 at 6:18 AM agree disagree
Hell yes! It was not so much the fight, it was Bieksa's style that got my blood pumping on this one.
Posted by smithers40 on Apr 19, 2011 at 11:57 PM agree disagree
Heres the deal,

You are up 7-1 with 4 minutes left, there is no reason to run around like he did. Looks bad on Bieksa but did he not expect to get his **** handed to him? You have a bunch of angry guys being down 6 goals and you start running around trying to be a tough guy? Bet he doesn't do it again with the game out of hand.
Posted by Minus on May 18, 2011 at 9:45 PM agree disagree
Bieksa owned Stalberg from start too finish. Switches hands and keeps feeding him.
Posted by irishpunk39 on Apr 20, 2011 at 8:28 AM agree disagree
earlier in the game bieksa skated away from scott.he would rather fight someone that dose not usually drop da gloves.but i dont blame him i would rather bully someone i know i could smack around than fight someone who knows what there doing.but what do you expect from a gutless puke.bieksa is a very good defencemen,but he waited for scott to get thrown out of the game and then all of a sudden started running his mouth and acting tough!!!!!!!next he is probably gonna challenge patick kane,or maybe coach q,or maybe one of the ice girls!!!!!!winner bieksa
Posted by trubba on Apr 20, 2011 at 12:43 PM agree disagree
Bieksa skated into him looking the other way....what would you do?
The rest of Stalbergs hits and trips were pointless especially when your up 7-1.
As for the visor, who cares?
Posted by B11ng on Apr 19, 2011 at 11:57 PM agree disagree
Stalberg got what he deserved
Posted by spl311 on Apr 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM agree disagree
stalberg got what he deserved..maybe canucks should insert rypien into the lineup for game 5.he has no problems throwing down with the big boys....maybe it will shut up all the scott lovers
Posted by ZorenKane on Apr 20, 2011 at 9:30 AM agree disagree
Poor Bieksa, can dish it out but can't take it. I noticed he stayed away from John Scott
Posted by jlamer12 on Apr 27, 2011 at 4:16 PM agree disagree
atta boy bieksa
Posted by eric3446 on Apr 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM agree disagree
Bieksa is a cheap pile of crap for completely mugging Stalberg on this one. Not to mention Bieksa is grabbing Stalberg's chin strap. Giving the win to Stalberg out of principle.
Posted by Pearson07 on Apr 21, 2011 at 9:55 AM agree disagree
Hey illukka, you know nothing about fighting CLEARLY. Stalberg isn't a fighter, he was jumped by Bieksa which is pretty obvious. Figure it out Bud. He wears a visor because he's a euro-soft like you.
Posted by schlado on Apr 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM agree disagree
Bieksa with a convincing win over the ever-feared Viktor Stalberg. It's a great thing he waited for Stalberg to line them up and challenged Stalberg when John Scott was still around....Oh wait, he didn't. Granted, Stalberg was asking for a challenge but it seemed that Bieksa did a good job of spot picking to me. I don't think he would have done that with Scott, Brouwer, or even Dowell if he was dressed. A 3 for being lopsided and spot-pickish.

And I'm giving the "Oops, I Poo'd Myself" award to Tanner Glass for wanting nothing to do with Big John Studd.

Plus, the refs toss Scott and Torres for yapping? WTF was I watching? Cricket?

Video

Share

Follow

Follow Me on Pinterest

Related Links